Global Temperatures Global Troposphere Temperatures click here For full size []]
Providing Insight
Into Climate Change

A Major Deception on Global Warming

Key changes were made to the IPCC's Second Assessment Report (SAR) on climate change after the scientists had met and accepted what they thought was the final peer-reviewed version. Frederick Seitz writes, "In my more than 60 years as a member of the American scientific community ... I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer-review process than the events that led to this IPCC report." Nearly all of the changes removed the skepticism with which many scientists regard claims that human activities are having a major impact on climate in general and on global warming in particular.

Infiltration: The Effect of Condoning Psychologically Intimidating Language in a Climate Science Peer-reviewed Journal

Vested interests and professional positioning have led a long-term attack on dissenting views on climate change. Various psychological intimidation tactics have been employed (name-calling, bullying) to denigrate and isolate researchers whose views and research dispute the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports. In most areas of science, new perspectives are welcomed and discussed in a collegial manner. The author examines a case study of a recent peer-reviewed paper in climate science, “Seepage: Climate change denial and its effect on the scientific community” Lewandowsky, Oreskes et al (2015), in which disparaging words have infiltrated peer-reviewed works thus becoming officially condoned as an acceptable part of the scientific language.

Black Swans: An essay by Dr. Gerrit J. van der Lingen

This essay by Dr. Gerrit J. van der Lingen describes the politics and the abusive philosophy of science as practised by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and its creations. The UN is using climate change as a tool to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years since the Industrial Revolution. The UN's real agenda is concentrated political authority. The theory of catastrophic man-made global warming has been falsified several times, but these “falsifications” have been totally ignored. It was once thought that “All swans are white” until a black swan was discovered.

Answering Nonsensical Charges Against ICSC, by Tom Harris

Tom Harris, Executive Director of the International Climate Science Coalition (ICSC), provides answers to nonsensical changes against ISCS in an error-riddled article published by Judah Freed on May 12, 2015 on Daily Kos. Freed's article is an attempt to discourage the media from publishing climate change facts from climate skeptics. The ICSC averages more than one significant media hit a day. Harris's answers to the nonsensical charges were deleted by Daily Kos shortly after it was submitted. The Daily Kos article falsely accuses the ICSC of being "industry-funded climate change deniers", and falsely claim that the Heartland Institute is a front for the Koch Brothers. They have never funded climate science activities of the Heartland Institute. The IPCC and FOS both promote the NIPCC report produced by the Heartland Institute.

The Globe and Mail’s Environmental Bias is Showing

The Globe and Mail recently ran an article about Friends of Science’s latest press release featuring an image of our new billboard which stated that “Global warming stopped naturally 16+ years ago.” The Toronto newspaper relied on incorrect assumptions to smear Friends of Science instead of reporting on content. We also challenged a letter from Greenpeace which threatened corporate officers for alleged ‘climate denial’ and announced a report entitled “Power. Full Benefits” that rebuts the Pembina Institute’s push for a renewable energy strategy in Alberta.

web design & development by: