Global Temperatures Global Troposphere Temperatures click here For full size []]
Providing Insight
Into Climate Change
Climate Policy
97 Articles

From Ice Age to Nice Age

Anyone familiar with history knows that climate changes throughout time. Global climate model simulations forecast that Anthropogenic (human-caused) Global Warming (AGW) may cause ‘catastrophic’ global warming. Most world governments ratified the United Nation's Kyoto Accord of 1997, hoping to reduce global warming by reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, the projected catastrophic temperatures that the UN’s Intergovern-mental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predicted have not happened. In fact, there was a natural slow-down and global warming went into hiatus before the Kyoto Accord was ever ratified, despite a rise in CO2 concentration. (now 18 years and 8 months of barely perceptible change) The world has spent $US 2.2 Trillion on renewable energy from 2004 through 2014 trying to reduce emissions, but carbon dioxide concentration has risen. Temperatures have not. That means the hypothesis is unproven and climate models are flawed. They should not be used for setting climate change policy.



CO2 Emissions Reduction, Renewables and Recession

This article by Euan Mearns of the website "Energy Matters" presents a graph that shows there is no correlation of the per capita wind + solar installed capacity of the European Union countries in 2014 with the CO2 reduction in each country for the period 2008-2014 (R2 = 0.01). Installing wind and solar devices appears to make no difference to CO2 emissions reduction. Economic growth does correlate strongly with the CO2 reduction in each country for the period 2008-2014 (R2 = 0.42). Countries with negative growth had the most CO2 emission reductions. Vibrant economies need energy to grow and most of that energy still comes from fossil fuels.



Clear the Air in Paris: Submission by Friends of Science

This Friends of Science document was prepared for the Canadian Federal Government, and copied to the Alberta's Climate Change Advisory Panel. Canada withdrew from Kyoto in 2011 to avoid ~$14 billion in penalties. In 2013, the IPCC reported that a naturally induced 15 years hiatus in global warming (now 18 years and 8 months) hiatus began before Kyoto was ever ratified. This evidence conflicts with the hypothesis of Anthropogenic Global Warming/Climate Change of carbon dioxide as the driver of warming. Carbon dioxide emissions from human activity have risen some 35% in the past 20 years despite measures said to reduce carbon emissions. Numerous unintended consequences of climate action have crippled national economies and pushed taxpayers into heat-or-eat poverty. Climate change targets could devastate the Canadian economy, especially if legally binding. It is time to clear the air.



Alberta Climate Change Panel too one-sided

Democracy based on the principle of widespread representation of different groups is a central feature of policy consideration. But the Alberta Climate Change Panel is made up solely of parties which favour renewables, carbon taxes, or cap and trade. They are not a balanced representation of society. The conclusion they reach may end up costing Albertans lots of money.



Who Cuts? Who Pays?

Energy economist Robert Lyman says that a new and legally binding international convention to be negotiated in Paris in December 2015 that forces countries like Canada to soon eliminate most uses of oil, natural gas and coal would impose extraordinary costs and societal changes; arguably, attaining this goal is not feasible in technical, economic or political terms. From 2010 onward 96% of emissions increases will occur in the developing countries, and especially in Asia. Previous conferences floundered on two central issues – who cuts and who pays. A “Green Climate Fund” of $100 billion per year by 2020 was proposed to pay for actions in developing countries to reduce GHG emissions.




web design & development by: